Suidlanders: Simon Roche’s ex-Girlfriend Catherine contacted me with many complaints – My Reponse

(005320.38-:E-003569.93:N-HO:R-SU:C-30:V)   

Earlier this week Catherine Grenfell, Simon Roche’s ex-girlfriend from 14 years ago, contacted me. She wanted me to remove the names of her 2 children which we had mentioned in an earlier article compiled by the Americans: IceBlock and Goy Rogers.

The changes she wanted me to make are in this article: VERY IMPORTANT: Americans Investigate Simon Roche; Gustav Muller & the Suidlanders: Part 1 & also: Roche’s Jewish-named children! – http://historyreviewed.com/?p=5129

All the information in the above article was revealed by the Americans to Chris Cantwell and me. You can hear Simon Roche being confronted with this information for the first time, on the Cantwell show here: Video: Jan Lamprecht confronts Simon Roche of the Suidlanders on the Cantwell Show – http://historyreviewed.com/?p=5571

NB: NB: NB: THIS ABOVE INTERVIEW WITH CANTWELL IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT INTERVIEWS ROCHE HAS EVER DONE. He admits to the truth of what the Americans discovered. He admits to additional things as well. I urge people to listen to it. In there he even claims to know one of Ramaphosa’s family members and to have lived on their property. 

While I was busy looking into Catherine’s request to remove her children’s names from the above article, I discovered that she had left a comment on the article back in April 2018, wherein she explained why she had chosen the children’s names. In there, on my website she actually had no problem mentioning her son’s names. But now, she has come to me telling me that putting her son’s names on my website is a criminal offence! So why then did she write her son’s names openly on my website in April if she was so concerned about the names of the children appearing here?

I have now even fixed her comment, while keeping a copy of it as it was when she wrote it originally. Here is the comment she left in April, with me having removed the children’s names from it:-

Here is the exchange between her and me from earlier this week. When she contacted me, asking me to remove her children’s names, I had no problem with the request and told her so. Here’s the exchange between us. I have removed her phone number from the chat below:-

You can draw your own conclusions about her from the way she writes.

As a website owner who has had many legal issues coming at me over the years, this is the first time someone has come to me writing about removing the names of children. When I was on Youtube, I had between 700-800 legal complaints coming at me from across Europe. On AfricanCrisis over the years I had several legal threats including one from a very famous international company based in Holland.

I don’t mind removing the names of the children at the request of a mother.  But I was curious about the issue of publishing the children’s names. Note that this information was compiled by Iceblock in the USA earlier this year.

Iceblock did the detective work, and Goy Rogers compiled the report. They sent me several articles that they had compiled. Whenever I read something that I was not sure of, I would ask Iceblock for proofs. In each case he supplied it. I therefore grew to trust Iceblock’s information and I did not question him about everything. I know that all the things he found, had an internet source. Iceblock does not make things up. So he must have had a source for the info about Catherine, which she is now saying is WRONG!

I popped Iceblock an email earlier this week informing him that Catherine Grenfell was questioning the facts presented and that I would forward him her complaints so that he could respond to them. I will forward him the contents of this article so that he can investigate and respond to her many complaints. I strongly suspect that whatever “incorrect” information lies in his report, actually comes from another internet source. I therefore want to know if Catherine has gone to that source and registered her complaints there and asked them to remove her son’s names there? If she hasn’t done so, then that raises some questions in my mind.

With regard to the legal question of whether it is illegal to publish the children’s names, I decided to ask 4 of my contacts, 2 of whom are lawyers. Here is a summary of what they said:-

Contact 1: Someone who works with children and even goes to the Children’s court. He said this: “It is better to remove the names for ‘safety’ reasons.” – He made it clear that it is “safety” but not openly illegal as Catherine claims.

Contact 2: Someone who has a good knowledge of the law and the internet. He told me that publishing the photos of the children is possibly illegal, but not their names alone.

Contact 3: A lawyer: He said to me it is not illegal to publish their names, but that a “highly technical legal argument” could possibly be made in this regard. But a lawyer would actually have to go to court to make such an argument.

Contact 4: A lawyer: He said to me I can keep their names on my website.

I just want to comment about her original comment above wherein she says she doesn’t know why her name, the children’s names and the companies Simon Roche worked for needed to be put on the internet:

The answer is really simple: Her ex, Simon Roche has been running around urgently begging for LARGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY from across the USA as well as South Africa for years now! It is in the interests of the public in the USA and South Africa, as well as any other countries he heads off to, for them to know about this guy’s background and his big claims which always end with a request for LOTS OF MONEY URGENTLY! 

Roche even tries to recruit people in other countries to come to fight a race war in South Africa! I wonder how legal that is hey?

We were becoming concerned about this unknown dodgy character Roche and his many bold claims and this is where the Americans especially, decided to dig into his past and his claims.

If Roche should be dragged into court one day, then Catherine and anyone else whom the legal process needs, can be subpoenaed to testify in court under oath about him, or his past, in any way that is needed.

Roche represents a Non-Profit-Company (NPC), the Suidlanders, which by South African Law, is supposed to open its books to anyone in the public who asks. He is busy soliciting money on a big scale, especially in the USA, year after year, and these people have a right to know whether Roche and the Suidlanders can be trusted. The most recent information I received, is that the Suidlanders are in the process of de-registering their NPC. I suspect this is because they do not like the idea of being open and honest about their finances as the LAW OF SOUTH AFRICA requires.

Catherine claims that the information presented by Iceblock and Goy Rogers is “shitty”. This is an interesting claim, because I urge everyone to go and listen to the interview that Roche did in April this year on the Chris Cantwell show, where for the first time, I actually interacted with him on a show and challenged him. ALL the information presented in the report by Iceblock was ALSO handed to Chris Cantwell. Cantwell then went and questioned Roche on the air about this information. There you will hear Roche admitting to the truth of what Iceblock uncovered, which nobody in South Africa had uncovered. You can hear Roche himself answering all the points raised by Cantwell, which are directly from Iceblock’s report.

NB: I am submitting all Catherine’s complaints to Iceblock and will publish any responses he sends me.

jlamprecht