Video: The Show that Simon Roche of the Suidlanders AVOIDED!!

(005320.38-:E-003569.93:N-HO:R-SU:C-30:V)   

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock came to me with an idea for a show after I confronted Simon Roche of the Suidlanders as a caller on Chris Cantwell’s show. Andrew wanted to mend things between us and to allow us a fair debate. Andrew proposed the idea that Simon and I each prepare 5 questions for the other to answer. Then he gives us the questions beforehand so that we have time to prepare.

Then the show is actually a moderated debate between Simon Roche and myself and Andrew would be the independent moderator.

Andrew then sent this email to myself and Simon Roche on 17th April 2018:-

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

Apr 17 (9 days ago)

to me, hk

Dear Jan and Simon,

I listened with interest to your exchange on Christopher Cantwell’s show recently, and I was wondering if you would like to join me for an hour this Thursday April 19th at 11AM South Africa time.

The show would essentially be a discussion between the two of you which I will moderate.

I was going to suggest you both come up with 5 questions for each other prior to the show, so Simon gets the opportunity to ask Jan direct questions and not just be grilled by Jan. Also if you advise the questions beforehand, you will have time to prepare your answers.

Simon, I have worked with Jan in the past, and did broadcast a program with him, Mel Ve and Vanessa Currie, which was critical of the Suidlanders.

However you have my word that I will not be ganging up on you with Jan during the show, I will act as an independent moderator, and ensure you both have the time you need to make your points.

I am very worried about my White brothers and sisters in South Africa, and based upon the way the British treated the South Africans in the concentration camps during the Boer Wars and ever since, being British myself I feel a sense of duty in providing a platform for these issues.

In conclusion I would actually like this show to be a means of proving the Suidlanders are a legitimate organisation working for White South Africans, so we Whites can unite and protect one another. Of course that will only be determined by the nature of information Simon is able to provide.

If you would like to do the show Simon, I would need your Skype ID, or alternatively you can send a Skype request to me at[DELETED]

If either of you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best Wishes,

Andy

I responded to Andrew’s request with a YES. But that day, Simon Roche never replied. By the the next day, the 18th Simon had still not replied to Andrew then sent me this email:

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

Apr 18 (8 days ago)

to me

Hi Jan,

Could you maybe email Simon directly in case my emails to him are being blocked and he did not receive the invite?

Many thanks,

Andy

So this is the email I sent to Simon. I made a mistake saying ACH is in the USA when in fact he is in the UK – but that was the quick email I just dashed off to Simon and copied Andrew on:

From: Jan Lamprecht

Apr 18 (8 days ago)

to Andrew, Simon

Hi Simon,

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock in the USA sent an email to you yesterday asking whether you would like to take part in a debate with me tomorrow. His email is below with his offer. He’s had no feedback from you and is concerned that maybe his emails to you are being blocked.

Can you please get back to him with an answer?

Thanks,

Jan

Then Andrew finally got a response from Simon:

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

Apr 18 (8 days ago)

to me

Hi Jan,

Simon has just replied from a different email address, I have said I will not reveal this address to you without his authorization, in the same way I said I would no reveal your gmail address to him without your authorization.

Here is what he wrote:

Dear Andrew,

Further to your email below.

Note that I am replying from my direct email address

I am sorry for the delayed reply; I spent yesterday on the road to and from a meeting a couple of provinces away and today we have had a power-cut in the village of Vanderkloof

If you don’t mind, I’d first like to give your proposition some thought. I will reply properly to you tomorrow once I have slept on it. Two factors make this slightly tricky. I’ll explain when I reply tomorrow (whether I accept the invitation or not).

Yours sincerely,

Simon Roche

Andrew then wrote:

Dear Simon,

Thank you for getting back to me.

I have Jan booked for tomorrow at 11AM South Africa time, so it is no problem for you to leave it till just before then to make a decision.

I would need a Skype ID for you though, if you wish to come on, as I can only connect to more than one person at a time via Skype.

But so long as you get that to me before 11AM tomorrow, I will be all set to call you both.

If you don’t want to come on, I was going to play a couple of segments from Chris Cantwell’s show in which you defended the Suidlanders, so at least I had something to play in your defence.

However, I have just thought that if you decide not to come on, if you would like to send me a prepared statement, I will read that out at the start of the program.

So a few options there for you.

Finally, and I only remembered yesterday why I did not take up our mutual friend Dave Gahary’s suggestion to have you on my program before.

I was concerned that I had heard you worked for the South African government in the past, and primarily that you had not joined the Suidlanders until very recently back whenever Dave made his approach, and I could not understand why you were placed in such a high position within the Suidlanders so soon after you joined. That was why I never contacted you to record a show.

This is not something I will bring up on the program, but I just wanted to explain this to you.

I will not reveal this email address to Jan without any authorization from you, so this will remain a private line of communication between us unless you instruct me otherwise.

In the meantime I thank you for taking the time to respond to me, I just wish individual groups could just get along and serve their people, but as we know that has never happened within our culture in the past, so is a challenge to achieve now and in the future.

Yours sincerely,

Andy

So we will have to wait and see Jan, but at least Simon has responded.

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

attachmentsApr 18 (8 days ago)

to me

Hi Jan,

In the event that Simon chooses not to join us, I will play the two attached audio clips, as this is Simon defending himself on a number of issues, and you will have the opportunity to respond to those.

Best,

Andy

So on the day of the interview, the 19th, Simon never replied to Andrew, despite his statement in his email:

Two factors make this slightly tricky. I’ll explain when I reply tomorrow (whether I accept the invitation or not).

So to my knowledge, Simon never responded to Andrew and we both did the show without him and that is the show that you’ll be hearing in this video.

jlamprecht