Video & Audio: Rebellion: Why didn’t Britain invade Rhodesia?

(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)   

In 1965, the People of the British colony of southern Rhodesia rebelled against Britain. They rejected the British orders to hand over power to people. A question that has bothered me in recent years when I began re-investigating Rhodesian history was this: Since the rebellion, like all rebellions, is ILLEGAL, why didn’t the British invade Rhodesia which was controlled by a small population of people?

It took some time, but I finally found the exact answer to this very important question. How was it that People could rebel against the UK openly and they were not invaded – which by rights they should have been?

In here, I discuss and show you the plans and intentions of the British politicians to invade and crush the rebellion. There were people in Africa, like the person President of Zambia who kept telling the British to crush the rebels and who allowed the British to send their air-force and military to Zambia, from which Rhodesia could be invaded.

The politicians had the power to carry out an invasion, and yet it never happened! Why?

Here’s the answer to one of the strangest mysteries of Rhodesia, a mystery that is almost never raised even by Rhodesians!!

This is a very important question, and I delve into the many things that happened, but hidden in here is a big pill for people. You will be surprised by the answer.

jlamprecht