VERY IMPORTANT: South Africa: Evil Ramaphosa wants to seize White Farmland without Compensation – My Analysis

[Below is a message that I received, which is doing the rounds. It is from the Freedom Front an Afrikaans political party started by General Constand Viljoen. This message by the FF is truly cause for concern. The idea that Julius Malema’s EFF and the ANC can together amend the constitution takes us right back to a Mugabe type situation. This is EXACTLY what Mugabe did in the year 2000 in order to allow him to spend the next 10 years seizing white farms.

If this goes through parliament it will be a shocker – the biggest shocker of black rule.

Let me say this: Any white arguments about the importance of food and that seizing white farmland will result in “food insecurity” will fall on deaf ears. This is black communists nonsense and they will see to it that they and their buddies get the food first. Also, the USA, the Liberal/Jewish/Elite filth of the world will probably give the blacks free food like they did to Zimbabwe. So any white notions that there will be bad results for the blacks, are wrong.

Furthermore, Mugabe targeted farms based on which farmers were the biggest threat to him. Thus this law would be very dangerous as the ANC WILL ABUSE IT TO TARGET WHITES WHO THREATEN IT. e.g. Whites who give money to political parties or organisations that threaten the Govt. Rest assured such a law WILL BE ABUSED TO THE FULL BY THE BLACKS as it was in Zimbabwe.

Whites also can’t understand the communist mindset. It is not about having blacks produce more food. This is about destroying white assets so that the whites no longer pose a threat. That’s what this is really about.

We will have to watch intensely what happens when the worthless shit we know as parliament opens to do its filthy business. If these scum can change the constitution then we have big trouble coming.

The FF says that economic growth is down to 0.6% per annum. If they begin seizing farmland rest assured money will flee the country. But I no longer care about these things. Its good that things BREAK. Whites need to rebuild their own things so that we can part company with these blacks.

Finally, in my book Government by Deception (2002), I had mentioned the danger of Ramaphosa specifically. See the parts of the FF press release below which I highlighted. General Tienie Groenewald who ran Military Intelligence for 20 years told me to my face in his house in 2001 when I went to speak to him, that Cyril Ramaphosa is extremely dangerous. I mentioned this in Government by Deception. I mentioned that I’d been told that if Ramaphosa becomes the President that “the whites are FINISHED”. Those are the exact words that General Groenewald told me. He said to me that Ramaphosa was the worst communist of the lot. The Jews and Liberals turned him into a billionaire, but clearly you can see this man is exceptionally devious and he knows how to lie politely. The Liberals/Jews and Elite inside and outside South Africa are ELATED that Ramaphosa is now in charge of the ANC itself and he’s the Vice President. They think he will unseat Zuma. I am not so sure. And he might be worse than Zuma. Whether he does or does not become the President, he has kicked off something very threatening.

It is something I’ve considered. If push came to shove, we whites could survive without the farmers. It won’t be pleasant and we’ll be a lot weaker, but it IS POSSIBLE. However, if we can put up a fight now, for the farmers, its something I’m game for because rest assured the ANC will go after ANY enemy, not just the farmers. They can go after businesses or anything else if they need to. Jan]

Home | Media Releases | ANC’s expropriation of land without compensation is dangerous
ANC’s expropriation of land without compensation is dangerous

2017-12-21
Dr Pieter Groenewald

The decision, taken at the ANC conference, that South Africa’s Constitution must be amended to allow for the expropriation of land without compensation is dangerous and poses a threat to the agricultural sector, private landownership and the economy. The decision essentially jeopardises all private landownership and it paves the way for the nationalisation of land in South Africa in the future,” says Dr Pieter Groenewald, leader of the FF Plus.

“Those that believe that the conditions of the resolution, namely that food security and the economy may not be harmed, will in effect make the expropriation of land without compensation impossible, are being misled. Cyril Ramaphosa has mastered the art of emphasising only those aspects that put people at ease and the interpretation of the said conditions will be an ANC-interpretation.

“Once the Constitution has been amended, the provision regarding food security will be interpreted such that it will allow for the expropriation of agricultural land without compensation.

“In his final speech at the ANC conference, Ramaphosa commended the ANC for promoting and building the economy since 1994. That, however, is an example of a flawed ANC-interpretation as the reality is that the economy has declined and now has a growth rate of only 0,6 %.

“Ramaphosa has no choice but to do the ANC’s bidding and as an individual, his power is limited. When the Constitution is amended, it will be all over for private landownership in the long term.

“In order to amend South Africa’s Constitution, the ANC needs a two-thirds majority that it doesn’t have, however, the EFF has already indicated that it will support such an amendment. With the support of the EFF, the ANC will meet the requirement of a two-thirds majority.

“The FF Plus will do everything in its power to oppose the amendment to the Constitution,” says Dr Groenewald.

Contact details: 083 627 4397 / 065 801 7216

2 thoughts on “VERY IMPORTANT: South Africa: Evil Ramaphosa wants to seize White Farmland without Compensation – My Analysis

  • 31st December 2017 at 6:57 pm
    Permalink

    Methinks that (((they))) created 2 ‘separate’ communist parties in the first place so that at some preplanned future point in time they could bring these ‘divided’ votes together to ensure a two thirds majority to bring in the communist manifesto requirement that there will be NO private property. That is (((their))) normal modus operandi

    Reply
  • 31st December 2017 at 6:37 pm
    Permalink

    As well as the ‘Communist mindset’, which was exposed brilliantly in your book “Government by Deception”, there is another mindset – the Black mindset as follows:
    >
    > TELL IT AS IT IS – by PRINCE MASHELA from THE SOWETAN TIMES ..
    >
    > In the midst of the political confusion that has gripped our country many people are wondering if we have come to the end of South Africa.
    >
    > The answer is simple: the thing called an “end” does not exist, not in relation to a country. SA will be there long after Jacob Zuma is gone.
    >
    > What Zuma has done is to make us come to the realisation that ours is just another African country, not some exceptional country on the
    > southern tip of the African continent.
    >
    > During the presidency of Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki, some among us used to believe that the black people of SA are better than those of
    > other African countries.
    >
    > We must all thank Zuma for revealing our true African character; that the idea of rule of law is not part of who we are, and that
    > constitutionalism is a concept far ahead of us as a people.
    >
    > How else are we to explain the thousands of people who flock to stadiums to clap hands for a president who has violated their
    > country’s constitution? Such people have no idea of constitutionalism.
    >
    > Now that we have reclaimed our place as another African country, we must reflect on and come to terms with our real character, and imagine
    > what our future portends.
    >
    > In a typical African country, ordinary people don’t expect much of politicians, because people get tired of repeated empty promises.
    >
    > In a typical African country, people have no illusions about the unity of morality and governance. People know that those who have power have
    > it for themselves and their friends and families.
    >
    > The idea that the state is an instrument for people’s development is a Western concept, and has been copied by pockets of Asian countries.
    >
    > Africans and their leaders don’t like to copy from the West. They are happy to remain African, and do things “the African way”.
    >
    > The African way is rule by kings, chiefs and indunas in a setting of unwritten rules. Is there anyone who has seen a book of African
    > customary laws?
    >
    > The idea that a commoner can raise questions about public money spent on the residence of a king is not African. The ANC MPs who have been
    > defending Zuma are true Africans.
    >
    > Asking a ruler to be accountable is a foreign – Western – idea. In a situation where there is conflict between a ruler and laws, Africans
    > simply change the laws to protect the ruler. This is why no single white person has called for King Dalindyebo to be released from jail.
    >
    > The problem with clever blacks is that they think they live in Europe,where ideas of democracy have been refined over centuries.
    >
    > What we need to do is to come back to reality, and accept that ours is a typical African country. Such a return to reality will give us a
    > fairly good idea of what SA’s future might look like…..
    >
    > This country will not look like Denmark. It might look like Nigeria, where anti-corruption crusaders are an oddity.
    > Being an African country, ours will not look like Germany. SA might look like Kenya, where tribalism drives politics.
    >
    > People must not entertain the illusion that a day is coming when SA will look like the US. Our future is more on the side of Zimbabwe,
    > where one ruler is more powerful than the rest of the population. Even if Julius Malema were to become president, it would still be the same.
    >
    > African leaders don’t like the idea of an educated populace, for clever people are difficult to govern. Mandela and Mbeki were
    > themselves corrupted by Western education. (Admission: this columnist is also corrupted by such education.)
    >
    > Zuma remains African. His mentality is in line with Boko Haram. He is suspicious of educated people; what he calls “clever blacks”. Remember
    > that Boko Haram means “Against Western Education”.
    >
    > The people who think we have come to the end of SA don’t realise that we have actually come to the beginning of a real African country, away
    > from the Western illusions of exceptionalism. Those who are unsettled by this true African character need help. The best we can do for them
    > is to ask them to look north of the Limpopo River, to learn more about governance in Africa.
    >
    > What makes most people restless about the future of SA is that they have Western models in mind, forgetting that ours is an African
    > country.
    >
    > The idea that a president can resign simply because a court of law has delivered an adverse judgment is Western. Only the Prime Minister of
    > Iceland does that; African rulers will never do that.
    >
    > Analysed carefully, the notion of SA coming to an “end” is an expression of a Western value system – of accountability, political morality, reason, and so on.
    >
    > All these are lofty ideas of Socrates,Kant, Hegel, and so on. They are not African.
    >
    > All of us must thank Jacob Zuma for introducing us to the real African Republic of South Africa, not some outpost of European values.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: